Researchers found that how much people enjoyed movies depended not just on the content of the movie, but also on who they were watching it with.
Particularly, the combination of watching a steamy love scene with your parents proved to be most unpleasant. Hmmm, ya think?
Most of us have faced this kind of situation at some time or another, and it's actually an incredibly intuitive result for anything social. The same might be said for many experiences, not just movies. How much you enjoy a meal depends not only on the food, but also where you're eating and who with. How much you enjoy (or tolerate) an airplane flight depends on how long it is, where you're going, and who you're sitting next to. The same activity done by yourself or with others may also lead to different feelings. (For me, drinking comes to mind.)
But as I was reading about this, I couldn't help but wonder about books: would these findings translate at all into the literary world? Part of what made me think about this was remembering one of the speakers at the Writer's Digest Conference, who talked about how the social aspects of reading had always been important, but were becoming more and more so. They're a big part of why some people read, and - as with movies - can be an integral part of the marketing. Think about the "guides for book clubs" that appear in the back of some books or the fact that "Oprah's book club" is not just a monthly book recommendation but an attempt to socialize (in a way) over the books.

The difference is that, with books, the consumption of the medium has to be an alone activity. (That's one of the things that sets reading apart from so many other things, and - in my view - makes it so great!) The closest book equivalent to watching a movie with your buds (or, God forbid, your parents) that I can conjure is the ludicrous image of you and several of your friends sitting next to each other on the couch and trying to read Freedom in as much synchronization as possible (with a bunch of popcorn out, just for kicks).
But just as you can talk about a movie with friends whether you watched it together or not (and I hardly ever go to the movies because I don't like the way movies blur the alone and the together - I want one or the other but not kinda sorta both at the same time), you can talk about a book with friends after reading it. The potential awkwardness of watching something sexual or violent or otherwise disturbing together is avoided, but the awkwardness of talking about it isn't necessarily - I'd guess it would depend on the centrality of that element to the plot. It might sometimes be easier with a movie to avoid talking it (say: a movie with one or two gory or sex scenes versus a book built around a character's sexual identity).
As a writer, I'd love to give my readers something substantive to talk about and think about, while at the same time not being so inaccessible that my work can't appeal to a wide range of people. In short, I'd love to write a nice book club book and capitalize on the social aspects of reading. But what are the elements of such a book?
People's enjoyment of your book will certainly be affected by the content (let's say plot and characters not worry too much about the writing itself for purposes here), but is there an equivalent to the enjoyment being affected by who else is reading it, or who they discuss it with? Short of being predisposed to not like a book because you're forced to read it (for a class or whatever) it is hard for me to think of when this would come into play.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?

6 comments:
Oooh, oooh! I have some thoughts on this, Lt. Pick me! Pick me!
Yes, I think you should PROOFREAD your fucking posts to ensure at least minimal comprehensibility before you post them.
Thx.
What about listening to a book on tape during a road trip with others? Not reading, per se, but still a social activity. I know of couples who do this.
Best example between us I can think of is discussing Monsters of Templeton. I still liked it and saw weaknesses as I read, but while discussing it with you was an agree to disagree situation, your assessment made me think "Hell, did I miss something? Was my critical reading meter way off?" Discussing it with my book club would have been a different beast--more people, more opinions, points that neither of us has thought of yet, a push in unexplored directions. I think if you discussed How I Became a Famous Novelist with a club, you'd find the same thing as opposed to discussing it with me, and it might lift your enjoyment of it more. Of course, these are two extreme examples of novels one of us enjoyed but the other hated.
I dissected your novel pretty well after beta reading it the first time. I pointed out a bunch of stuff that could be discussed that you hadn't realized was in the text. That's the beauty of letting the work go--what comes back to you can be pretty damn intriguing, baffling, and exciting. A club could have a long discussion about it that bounces all over the place (and that's fun, even if you [the general you, not you-you] don't agree on all points).
Reading is a pretty solitary experience, at least for me. Talking about a book with others would decrease my enjoyment of it -- I did enough of that in college and if I had it to do over again, would major in something other than literature.
Watching a movie with someone you like can enhance the experience. As long as they don't keep asking, "Who is that guy?" or the like.
Great post, really liked it. For me, discussing a book really adds to the enjoyment. But as much as I like reading non-fiction (as you know), I find book club discussions are best suited for fiction. Discussing a book about U.S. foreign policy just wasn't as much fun as when we dissected some good literature.
I've also found that the specific people I'm discussing with makes a big difference. Not all of my friends are the book club type.
Thanks, all, for your comments.
Lt. C - STFU. Thx.
belimperia - we talked last night about books on tape - I really don't think it is "reading" (just as looking at a musical score, even if you are a gifted musician, isn't "listening to music." You're right that discussing with one person is different from discussing with a larger group, but the best kind of discussions are those where you get a new perspective to think about.
Trav - I think you definitely wouldn't like watching a movie with me. I *try* not to do that, but don't always succeed.
Praj - Seems like you and belimperia are on the same page. I just asked her and she says she had the same experience discussing nonfiction with her book club. The fiction discussions were much richer.
Post a Comment